Short answer: no individual milligram amounts are published for any of the four ingredients — a real limitation, and this site says so clearly rather than letting the gap go unmentioned.
Why this gap is worth stating directly
Without disclosed doses, buyers can't independently compare this formula's amounts against the research doses cited for each ingredient — a genuine limitation on evaluating the formula fully.
What "transparent about gaps" actually looks like
- Explicitly stating doses aren't disclosed, rather than implying full transparency
- Naming this limitation on multiple pages, not just buried in fine print once
- Not compensating for the gap with exaggerated efficacy claims elsewhere
💡 The honest standard: "no ingredient doses are disclosed, and we say so clearly" is itself a meaningful transparency commitment — the honesty is about the disclosure of the gap, not the presence of the gap itself.
Why this matters alongside the myth-vs-fact framing
A brand willing to state a real limitation about its own product, in addition to correcting external marketing myths, is showing a more consistent honesty standard across both dimensions.
Read IQHoney's full transparency disclosures
What's disclosed, and what isn't, stated plainly.
Check Current Pricing60-day money-back guarantee